So kotj is either stupid and can't track his arguments or he can track his arguments in which case he is a failed troll or a liar. And yes kotj and db, this logically covers all options
CHEATING
18/02/18 13:36
18/02/18 13:38
And for all logicians and consultants out there. Making a concrete concise point is usually better than needing to write an epic.
18/02/18 13:43
18/02/18 13:43
18/02/18 14:36
King of the Jungle (#Rugga) :
Win or lose a discussion? Really? Grow up man.
Everything is not about winning or losing..
Learn what is a debate..
Look at that: i let you “win” the conversation.. get a gold belt if that makes you happier in life.
But you have still not given me one cogent argument. Except saying that the definition of cheating in all dictionaries is wrong..
One of the fallen legends of the game :
What a load of dribble. King of the Moaners it seems rather than jungle. You are entitled to your view but the moderators appointed by Sweetnitro have on many occasions informed people to stop using the term. It is your choice but you will never win this argument as they have pointed out to you.
What a load of dribble. King of the Moaners it seems rather than jungle. You are entitled to your view but the moderators appointed by Sweetnitro have on many occasions informed people to stop using the term. It is your choice but you will never win this argument as they have pointed out to you.
Win or lose a discussion? Really? Grow up man.
Everything is not about winning or losing..
Learn what is a debate..
Look at that: i let you “win” the conversation.. get a gold belt if that makes you happier in life.
But you have still not given me one cogent argument. Except saying that the definition of cheating in all dictionaries is wrong..
I do not need to KOTJ as is not my argument. It was just a series of observations on the most pointless thread ever. If you can't convince people in 30 pages of debate where your view changes then you are unlikely to do so I would suggest. I do not engage in the practices myself but I also do not call it cheating and in reality it has cost many of those indulging in the practices with the rules change. At least they have some mates so better luck next time and perhaps pick on a paper bag, as you might win that one.
18/02/18 14:55
This is too bad, I was hoping to hear about the 3 second ruck being obtained with cheating, I was hoping to see him argue with himself and the quotes of his (I didn't have to Cathy Newman the quotes by saying, so what you're saying is). And I was really looking to get into the action that happens in a scrum, but for some reason I have a feeling he never played in the front row and can't comprehend what actually happens in that chess match. But oh well, silence is his concession.
18/02/18 15:06
The morale of this story, you wine some you loose some.
18/02/18 21:16
Oh waw, I see I made your day.
Apparently you don t know the concept of having a real life and going out to meet with people..
But I am glad I made your day more interesting so you could type some messages on the forum..
Apparently you don t know the concept of having a real life and going out to meet with people..
But I am glad I made your day more interesting so you could type some messages on the forum..
18/02/18 21:23
Phalanx Damage Inc. :
One person may have a different opinion of what is ethical and morally acceptable than another. Cheating is breaking a written rule. Doing something that in your opinion is unethical, but is not an infringement of a written rule, is not cheating. It's not that difficult to understand.
One person may have a different opinion of what is ethical and morally acceptable than another. Cheating is breaking a written rule. Doing something that in your opinion is unethical, but is not an infringement of a written rule, is not cheating. It's not that difficult to understand.
I am impressed Phalanx... you are re-inventing the english language... as the dictionary (you know the big book where you see many words and the definition next to it.. apparently you haven’t opened one for a while) says exactly the opposite of what you said..
Well done, you have your own language now...
18/02/18 21:31
King of the Jungle (#Rugga) :
Well.. Apparently if you have some reading problems, because I have already explained it twice.
Somebody who “grew up” in rugby and who like Rugby for his values (as Respect of your teammates and your opponents) will not use some sneaky tactics to win. He will even prefer to loose in a fair and good game that win in an unfair manner (according to Rugby morale rules).
Well.. Apparently if you have some reading problems, because I have already explained it twice.
Somebody who “grew up” in rugby and who like Rugby for his values (as Respect of your teammates and your opponents) will not use some sneaky tactics to win. He will even prefer to loose in a fair and good game that win in an unfair manner (according to Rugby morale rules).