New Rankings System

Can you let us know what the rankings are based on please?

At the time of writing, Slippery Tigers is apparently the game's best player. He's not top of his level 22 league, he's not got the highest average star team rating, and his name isn't at the top of alphabetical sorting when it comes to no. of fans.

Can you explain the rankings to us and what the hierarchy is? I.e. is fan numbers first, then star rating, for instance?

Thanks!
Possibly on achievements?
perhaps. My guild members (BiA) have all completed all the achievements though..
Not sure where that has come from. Had a look at rankings and he appears to be 198. Where did you get the info from?
Carshalton Colts :

Not sure where that has come from. Had a look at rankings and he appears to be 198. Where did you get the info from?

[img][/img]


On mine he appears top: http://imgur.com/0ShBAsP

<blockquote class="imgur-embed-pub" lang="en" data-id="0ShBAsP"><a href="//imgur.com/0ShBAsP">View post on imgur.com</a></blockquote><script async src="//s.imgur.com/min/embed.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
I cannot seem to get to that screen through ipad app. Also may differ between records for day, month or all time perhaps?
Eastbourne :

perhaps. My guild members (BiA) have all completed all the achievements though..


I meant number of tournaments and championships won.
Carshalton Colts :

I cannot seem to get to that screen through ipad app. Also may differ between records for day, month or all time perhaps?


Try this? http://i.imgur.com/RPba4Wj.png http://imgur.com/RPba4Wj

There doesn't seem to be any filter to display different records.
Waspy Tiger :

Eastbourne :

perhaps. My guild members (BiA) have all completed all the achievements though..


I meant number of tournaments and championships won.


Ahh sorry! I'm talking about the new individual player rankings?
Eastbourne :

Waspy Tiger :

Eastbourne :

perhaps. My guild members (BiA) have all completed all the achievements though..


I meant number of tournaments and championships won.


Ahh sorry! I'm talking about the new individual player rankings?


Indeed. Wouldn't it seem sensible to base them on what someone has won?